Characteristics analysis of rocket projectile based on intelligent morphing technology

XU Yong-jie, WANG Zhi-jun

(College of Mechatronic Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China)

徐永杰， 王志軍

(中北大學 機電工程學院， 山西 太原 030051)

?

Characteristics analysis of rocket projectile based on intelligent morphing technology

XU Yong-jie, WANG Zhi-jun

(CollegeofMechatronicEngineering,NorthUniversityofChina,Taiyuan030051,China)

Nose deflection control is a new concept of fast response control model. The partial nose of projectile deflects a certain angle relative to the axis of projectile body and then pressure difference emerges on the windward and leeward sides of warhead. Consequently, aerodynamic control force is generated. This control way has high control efficiency and very good application prospects in the ammunition system. Nose deflection actuator based on smart material and structure enables projectile body morphing to obtain additional aerodynamic force and moment, changes the aerodynamic characteristics in the projectile flight process, produces the corresponding balance angle and sideslip angle resulting in motor overload, adjusts flight moving posture to control the ballistics, finally changes shooting range and improves firing accuracy. In order to study characteristics of self-adaptive control projectile, numerical simulations are conducted by using fluid dynamics software ANSYS FLUENT for stabilized rocket projectile. The aerodynamic characteristics at different nose delectation angles, different Mach numbers and different angles of attack are obtained and compared. The results show that the nose deflection control has great influence on the head of rocket projectile, and it causes the asymmetry of the flow field structure and the increase of pressure differences of the warhead on the windward and leeward surface, which results in a larger lift. Finally, ballistics experiments are done for verification. The results can offer theoretical basis for self-adaptive rocket projectile design and optimization and also provide new ideas and methods for field smart ammunition research.

rocket projectile; intelligent morphing technology; nose deflection; ballistics characteristics

0 Introduction

Smartness, intelligence and high mobility of ammunition will be the important development directions of ammunition technology in a long historical period in the future[1-3]. To research and develop active, detective and self-adaptive ballistic correction and autonomous smart attack ammunition by means of various innovative and intelligent control technologies, simple guidance way or ballistic adaptive way has become the research hotspot of national defense science and technology in the world.

Intelligent morphing technology means that the shape of self-adaptive aircraft changes according to flight mission, flight speed and flight environment. It uses intelligent material or structure to realize active, adaptive and continuous changes in appearance to meet different missions with different aerodynamic layouts, thus performance optimization of aerodynamic and flight is achieved[4-7]. For modern high mobility weapons, it can solve the contradictions of different aerodynamic layouts of the aircrafts designed by intelligent morphing technology and improve economic efficiency and operational capability.

Human beings are dedicated to development of lighter and more intelligent missiles now and even for the future. Research on creative and intelligent control technology has very important significance and practical value, where external ballistics plays a key role in this modern missile control technology.

1 Modeling

1.1 Geometrical model

The 3D model of simplified standard fin stabilized rocket projectile is shown in Fig.1, where lengthL=600.0 mm, and diameterD=90.0 mm. The rocket projectile with nose deflection angleδis shown in Fig.2.

Fig.1 Standard fin stabilized rocket projectile

Fig.2 Rocket projectile with nose deflection angle

1.2 Mass properties

The trajectory correction models for rocket projectiles with different nose deflection angles, including 0°, 2°, 4°, 6°, 8° and 10°, are established. The mass properties of each model are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Mass properties

1.3 Aerodynamic force analysis

According to ballistic theory[8-9], in the flight process of projectile, regardless of the spinning, in order to measure the effects from each force and resultant force, all the forces and moments are simplified as the centroid of projectile. For illustrating conveniently, it is shown in Fig.3.

Fig.3 Diagram for simplifying aerodynamic forces

1)Rxis drag and expressed as

whereCxis drag coefficient andSMis reference area (m2).

2)Ryis lift and expressed as

whereCyis drag coefficient andSMis reference area (m2).

3)Mzis static moment and expressed as

wheremzis moment coefficient.

2 Ballistic flight flow field simulation

Mach numbers in simulation are 0.8， 1.0， 1.2， 2.0 and 3.0, respectively, involving subsonic, transonic and supersonic speed ranges; and nose deflection angles contains 0°， 2°， 4°， 6°， 8° and 10°. The dynamics parameters such as flow field velocity and pressure, drag coefficient, lift coefficient and pitching moment coefficient, are obtained by simulation. In computational procedure, single equation model Spalart-Allmaras is used for turbulence model[10-13], which only solves a transport equation about the eddy viscosity and obtains good results involving wall limit flow problem and inverse pressure gradient of boundary layer problem. It is commonly used for solving aerodynamic problems of aircraft, flow around airfoil, flow field analysis, and so on.

2.1 Pressure field analysis

Typical simulation results of pressure field distribution are shown in Fig.4. Fig.4(a) is the pressure nephogram and Fig.4(b) is the pressure contour line.

Fig.4 Pressure field distribution

As shown in Fig.4, the pressure on projectile increases with the increase of deflection angle. For nose deflection angle of 10°, there is a mutation pressure due to its unsmooth surface. The greater the deflection angle is, the more obvious the mutation pressure is.

The warhead is the most stressful part of the whole projectile, whereby ballistic cap is the most stressful part in the warhead. Its pressure grows with the increase of Mach number and the pressure region has a tendency to gradually expand and gradually move to the rear end of rocket.

When air flows through the pressure region, there is an inflection point of pressure on the shoulder of the rocket, then gas expansion wave emerges. At the same time, a low pressure area emerges in the area near the bottom of the projectile, and it becomes smaller and smaller when Mach number increases, and the speed difference is more and more obvious. The reason is that the rocket empennage impedes the air flow, consequently gas choking phenomenon appears in the empennage leading edge and dilatational wave appears in the empennage trailing edge, finally the interaction leading edge and trailing edge flow field form tail flow field.

In addition, it can be seen that the pressure flow field distribution is asymmetric, and the asymmetry intensifies that because of the existence of nose deflection angle, in front of the shoulder, with the increase of deflection angle, the pressure coefficient on the windward side is larger than that on the leeward side. On the back of the shoulder, with the increase of deflection angle, the pressure coefficient diminishes on the windward side and increases on the leeward side, and the pressure coefficient on the windward side is less than that on the leeward side.

2.2 Velocity field analysis

Typical simulation results of pressure field distribution are shown in Fig.5. Fig.5(a) is the pressure nephogram and Fig.5(b) is the pressure contour line.

As shown in Fig.5, a high pressure area emerges around warhead in the flight process of external ballistics, and vortex area and stress concentration are around tail.

Deflection angle has important influence on tail flow field. The larger the deflection angle is, the greater impact it has. Circle flow field changes a lot because of the warhead deflection angle. With the increase of deflection angle, the rocket overall speed slows down. The head velocity is low, and the low speed region caused by warhead is larger and moves to rear end of the rocket.

Fig.5 Velocity field distribution

The larger the deflection angle is, the greater impact it has on the warhead flow field structure and the less impact it has on the downstream flow field. The tail flow field asymmetry increases with the increment of deflection angle. The greater the deflection angle is, the greater warhead disturbance impact it has on the tail flow field. High speed area emerges on the warhead and expansion wave emerges on the shoulder at the same time.

There is also a speed-jump on the shoulder windward side because of the existence of attack angle, and the larger Mach number, the larger speed-jump area. The fluid velocity is low in the empennage leading-edge area. Choking phenomenon occurs because of its retardation, and a series of smaller spirals also emerge in the tail flow field due to the speed differences caused by projectile disturbance.

2.3 Aerodynamic characteristics analysis

Calculation of drag coefficient is shown in Fig.6, and the changing laws of all the models are consistent and the curves change smoothly.

Under the condition of the same Mach number, when the attack angle is 0°, aerodynamic drag coefficient changes smaller with the change of nose deflection angle. By comparing a large amount of simulation data, rocket projectile’s aerodynamic performance is poor in subsonic and transonic velocity ranges and aerodynamic lift and control torque are limited very much in subsonic velocity range.

Fig.6 Drag coefficient when attack angle is 0°

Simulations of lift coefficient and control moment coefficient are shown in Fig.7.

Lift coefficient and additional control torque change obviously when the attack angle is 2° and aerodynamic performance changes significantly. Aerodynamic lift and control moment caused by nose deflection angle are objective and the smaller nose deflection angle can produce large aerodynamic control force.

Control mode of nose deflection can provide greater aerodynamic lift and torque control than rocket projectile without nose deflection angle. Lift coefficient ratio and control moment coefficient ratio of rocket projectile with different nose deflection angles are shown in Table 2.

Fig.7 Aerodynamic coefficient when attack angle is 2°

Table 2 Calculation results of coefficient ratio

In supersonic velocity range, nose deflection angle is 10°. And it can provide the aerodynamic lift 2.64 times and control moment 15.28 times as much as that without nose deflection angle.

3 Experiment

To improve rocket projectile design, the experiments for ballistic correction of rocket projectile with nose deflection angle of 5° was conducted. There are 5 ballistic correction rocket projectiles prepared for the flying experiment[14-15]. The arrangement for testing is shown in Fig.8.

Fig.8 Arrangement for testing

The distance of 200 m was intercepted in the shooting range direction and the distance between the aiming point and fall point was determined as transverse correction range, marked as ΔX.

In order to get convenient verification, the nose deflection angle was set toward to the same launch direction and the distance between aiming point and fall point was measured as the horizontal correction range caused by nose deflection angle. The experimental results are shown in Table 3. The results show that at the velocity of 151.06 m/s and nose deflection angle being of 5°, the ballistic correction for rocket projectile can obtain horizontal correction range of 0.43 m on the average.

Table 3 Horizontal correction value

4 Conclusions

From the simulation calculation and ballistic experiment on deflectable nose rocket projectile, the following conclusions can be obtained:

1) Large number of aerodynamic simulations show that using nose deflection angle can achieve desired aerodynamic lift, aerodynamic drag and additional torque control. Furthermore, it can correct ballistic trajectory effectively and realize rocket projectile maneuvering flight.

2) With rocket projectile ballistic correction as fine pneumatic control characteristics in the supersonic velocity range and limited aerodynamic performance in subsonic velocity range. Nose deflection has greater influence on warhead flow field structure and smaller impact on the downstream.

3) With the increase of nose deflection angle, the pressure on the rocket body increases, especially the pressure mutation on the area around the shoulder of the rocket. The flow field changes dramatically and the pressure becomes bigger with the deflection angle being larger. The expansion waves emerge on the shoulder and low pressure area at the bottom of the projectile. The asymmetry of the flow field is bigger and different pressures on the windward and leeward surfaces increase, which result in larger lift.

4) Flight test shows that flying control method of nose deflection is feasible and reliable, thus it can be used for engineering research in the further.

[1] YIN Jian-ping, WANG Zhi-jun. Ammunition theory. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2014.

[2] ZHANG Bo, WANG Shu-shan, CAO Meng-yu, et al. Impacts of deflection nose on ballistic trajectory control law. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014.

[3] GAO Ting-xin. Study of aerodynamic characteristics of migraine control. In: Proceedings of Aviation Aircraft Development and Aerodynamics Seminar, Hangzhou, 2006.

[4] ZHANG Tong, ZHAO Xiao-li. Analysis of trajectory correction projectile and its key technology.Cruise Missile, 2014, 24(5): 38-42.

[5] Landers M G, Hall L H, Auman L M, et al. Deflectable nose and canard controls for a fin-stabilized projectile at supersonic and hypersonic speeds. In: Proceedings of the 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Orlardo, Florida, 2003: 1.

[6] XIA Bin, ZHOU Liang. Trajectory correction projectile and analysis on the key technologies for the trajectory correction process. National Defense Science & Technology, 2013, 34(3): 27-33.

[7] Vaughn, M E, Auman L M. Assessment of a productivity-oriented cfd methodology for designing a hypervelocity missile. In: Proceedings of the 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Orlardo, Florida, 2003: 23-29.

[8] HAN Zi-peng. Exterior ballistics of projectile and rockets. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2014.

[9] XU Ming-you. Advanced external ballistics. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003.

[10] YU Wen-jie. Study of aerodynamic characteristics for a fin-stabilized projectile with a deflectable nose control. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science&Technology, 2010.

[11] WANG Fei, WU Guo-dong, WANG Zhi-jun. Numerical calculation of aerodynamic characteristics of shell with attack angle at the shell head. Journal of North China Institute of Technology, 2005, 26(3): 177-179.

[12] WEIi Fang-hai, WANG Zhi-jun, YIN Jian-ping. Numerical calculation of aerodynamic characteristics of shell with an angle of warhead. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2006, 26(1): 553-558.

[13] DONG Er-bao. Research on realization mechanism and some key technologies of smart morphing aircraft structures. Anhui: University of Science and Technology of China, 2010.

[14] XU Yu-xin, WANG Shu-shan. Armor-piercing experiment on fragment against sandwich plate with fiber reinforced composite cores. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2012, 29(3): 72-78.

[15] XU Yu-xin, WANG Shu-shan. Armor-piercing ultimate of tungsten alloy spherical fragment against low-carbon steel. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(5): 192-195.

基于智能變形技術的火箭彈特性分析

偏轉頭部控制是一種新概念快速響應的控制方式。 彈頭部相對于彈軸進行局部偏轉， 并且在彈頭的迎風面和背風面形成壓力差從而產生空氣控制力， 在彈藥系統里， 這是一個高效并具有良好應用前景的控制方式。 基于智能材料和結構的彈箭頭部智能變形驅動機構可以使彈箭獲得額外的控制力和控制力矩， 改變彈丸在飛行過程中的空氣動力特性， 在彈箭飛行過程中會產生附加的平衡角、 側滑角， 進而產生機動過載， 控制飛行姿態和飛行彈道， 并在最后時限提高彈丸的射擊精確度。 為了研究自適應控制彈箭的特性， 利用流體力學軟件對尾翼穩定的火箭彈進行了數值模擬。 獲得不同頭部偏角、 不同馬赫數和不同攻角情況下的彈箭空氣動力學特性。 結果表明， 偏轉頭部控制對彈箭的頭部具有較大的影響， 并且引起流場的不對稱性。 彈頭部迎風面和背風面的壓力差為彈箭提供較大的升力。 最后， 做彈道試驗驗證了仿真的研究結果。 研究結果可以為自適應彈箭的設計及優化提供理論基礎， 并為智能彈藥的研究提供新思路和新方法。

火箭彈； 智能變形技術； 頭部偏轉； 彈道特性

XU Yong-jie, WANG Zhi-jun. Characteristics analysis of rocket projectile based on intelligent morphing technology. Journal of Measurement Science and Instrumentation, 2015, 6(3)： 205-211. [

徐永杰， 王志軍

(中北大學 機電工程學院， 山西 太原 030051)

10.3969/j.issn.1674-8042.2015.03.001]

XU Yong-jie (yongqiang515@126.com)

1674-8042(2015)03-0205-07 doi： 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8042.2015.03.001

Received date： 2015-05-15

CLD number： TJ415 Document code： A